Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 8 January 2016 at 13:36, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > I would agree except for the observation on toast indexes. I think
> > that's an important enough use case that perhaps we should have both.
> The exclusion of toast indexes is something we can remove also, I have
> recently discovered. When we access toast data we ignore MVCC, but we still
> have the toast pointer and chunkid to use for rechecking our scan results.
> So a later patch will add some rechecks.
Ah, interesting, glad to hear. I take it you're pushing your patch
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: