Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> writes: > In the meantime, I had a question about bumping the version to 1.3.
> Version 1.2 of pg_trgm has never been included in a community release > (because it didn't make the 9.5 cutoff). So should we really bump the > version to 1.3, or just merge the changes here directly into the > existing 1.2 HEAD code? > I think it would be pretty odd for 9.5. to come with pg_trgm 1.1 and > for 9.6 to come with pg_trgm 1.3. +1 for not bumping the version, if we've not shipped 1.2 yet. There's enough maintenance overhead in an extension version bump that we should not do one unnecessarily. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers