Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Incidentally, if we're going to whack around the latch API, it would > be nice to pick a design which wouldn't be too hard to extend to > waiting on multiple sockets. The application I have in mind is to > send of queries to several foreign servers at once and then wait until > bytes come back from any of them. It's mostly pie in the sky at this > point, but it seems highly likely to me that we'd want to do such a > thing by waiting for bytes from any of the sockets involved OR a latch > event.
Instead of SetSocketToWaitOn, maybe AddSocketToWaitSet and RemoveSocketFromWaitSet? And you'd need some way of identifying which socket came ready after a wait call... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers