Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > I've cleaned up the code, created a separate JsonbRef node (and there are a > lot of small changes because of that), abandoned an idea of "deep nesting" > of assignments (because it doesn't relate to jsonb subscription, is more > about the > "jsonb_set" function, and anyway it's not a good idea). It looks fine for > me, and I need a little guidance - is it ok to propose this feature for > commitfest 2016-03 for a review?
Has this patch been proposed in some commitfest previously? One of the less-commonly-invoked rules of commitfests is that you can't add patches that are too invasive to the last one -- so your last chance for 9.6 was 2016-01. This is harsh to patch submitters, but it helps keep the size of the last commitfest down to a reasonable level; otherwise we are never able to finish it. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
