On 20 January 2016 at 02:14, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > > > I've cleaned up the code, created a separate JsonbRef node (and there > are a > > lot of small changes because of that), abandoned an idea of "deep > nesting" > > of assignments (because it doesn't relate to jsonb subscription, is more > > about the > > "jsonb_set" function, and anyway it's not a good idea). It looks fine for > > me, and I need a little guidance - is it ok to propose this feature for > > commitfest 2016-03 for a review? > > Has this patch been proposed in some commitfest previously? Unfortunately, it wasn't. I just sent an intermediate version of this patch to hackers several months ago to discuss it. you can't add patches that are too invasive to the last one -- so your last > chance for 9.6 was 2016-01. Yes, that's what I was worried about (although I didn't know exactly about this rule before).
