On 20 January 2016 at 02:14, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com>
wrote:

> Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
>
> > I've cleaned up the code, created a separate JsonbRef node (and there
> are a
> > lot of small changes because of that), abandoned an idea of "deep
> nesting"
> > of assignments (because it doesn't relate to jsonb subscription, is more
> > about the
> > "jsonb_set" function, and anyway it's not a good idea). It looks fine for
> > me, and I need a little guidance - is it ok to propose this feature for
> > commitfest 2016-03 for a review?
>
> Has this patch been proposed in some commitfest previously?


Unfortunately, it wasn't. I just sent an intermediate version of this patch
to hackers several months ago to discuss it.

you can't add patches that are too invasive to the last one -- so your last
> chance for 9.6 was 2016-01.


Yes, that's what I was worried about (although I didn't know exactly about
this rule before).

Reply via email to