> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> If we would go this way, question is if we should back patch this or >>> not since the patch apparently changes the existing >>> behaviors. Comments? I would think we should not. >> >> I am sure, so we should not backport this change. This can breaks customer >> regress tests - and the current behave isn't 100% correct, but it is safe. > > Quite. This is not a bug fix. It's a behavior change, perhaps for the > better.
Added to the commitfest 2016-03. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
