On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff
> <mailingli...@toco-domains.de> wrote:
> > On 26.01.2016 07:52, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>> Imagine for example a script that in some rare cases passes happens to
> >>> pass infinity into generate_series() - in that case I'd much rather
> >>> out than wait till the end of the universe.
> >>> So +1 from me to checking for infinity.
> >> +1
> >> ERROR infinite result sets are not supported, yet
> > Maybe we should skip the "yet". Or do we really plan to support them in
> > (infinite) future? ;)
> > +1 from me to check infinity also.
> Something like the patch attached would be fine? This wins a backpatch
> because the query continuously running eats memory, no?
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
> To make changes to your subscription:
I'll modify my generate_series_date to give similar errors.
I have no opinion on backpatch.
+1 for flippant references to infinity.