On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:53:26PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff
> <mailingli...@toco-domains.de> wrote:
> > On 26.01.2016 07:52, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>> Imagine for example a script that in some rare cases passes
> >>> happens to pass infinity into generate_series() - in that case
> >>> I'd much rather error out than wait till the end of the
> >>> universe.
> >>> So +1 from me to checking for infinity.
> >> +1
> >> ERROR infinite result sets are not supported, yet
> > Maybe we should skip the "yet". Or do we really plan to support
> > them in (infinite) future? ;)
> > +1 from me to check infinity also.
> Something like the patch attached would be fine? This wins a
> backpatch because the query continuously running eats memory, no?
+1 for back-patching. There's literally no case where an infinite
input could be correct as the start or end of an interval for
David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: