On 28 January 2016 at 16:36, Shulgin, Oleksandr <
oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Shulgin, Oleksandr
>> <oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Please find attached a simple copy-paste fix for CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT
>> > syntax.
>>
>> We should change also START_REPLICATION SLOT syntax document as follows?
>>
>> -      <para><literal>START_REPLICATION SLOT
>> <replaceable>slot_name</replaceable> LOGICAL
>> <replaceable>options</replaceable></literal></para>
>> +      <para><literal>START_REPLICATION SLOT
>> <replaceable>slot_name</replaceable> LOGICAL
>> <replaceable>XXX/XXX</replaceable>
>> (<replaceable>options</replaceable>)</literal></para>
>>
>
> If a committer would thinks so, I don't object.  Though this one is rather
> a detail for which the reader is already referred to protocol-replication,
> while my fix was about a factual error.
>
>
I think it should be changed. I've already had people confused by this.

Either that or remove the synopsis entirely, changing it to

    START_REPLICATION SLOT ....

and linking to the protocol docs. Which might be better.



-- 
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Reply via email to