On 1/28/16 9:46 AM, Christoph Berg wrote: > If a cluster is configured for non-hot-standby replication, the > READY=1 seems to never happen. Did you check if that doesn't trigger > any timeouts with would make the unit "fail" or the like?
As Pavel showed, it doesn't work for that. I'll look into that. > Also, I'm wondering how hard it would be to get socket activation work > with that? (I wouldn't necessarily recommend that for production use, > but on my desktop it would certainly be helpful not to have all those > 8.4/9.0/.../9.6 clusters running all the time doing nothing.) I had looked into socket activation, and it looks feasible, but it's a separate feature. I couldn't really think of a strong use case, but what you describe makes sense. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers