2016-01-30 22:38 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>:
> On 1/29/16 4:15 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Hi
> > >
> > >
> > > You sent only rebased code of previous version. I didn't find
> > > checks.
> > Oops. Here is the actual new code.
> > New test is working as expected
> > I did lot of tests - and this code works perfect in single server mode,
> > and with slave hot-standby mode.
> > It doesn't work with only standby mode
> Yeah, I hadn't though of that. How about this change in addition:
> diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
> index 2e7f1d7..d983a50 100644
> --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
> +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
> @@ -4933,6 +4933,11 @@ sigusr1_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS)
> if (XLogArchivingAlways())
> PgArchPID = pgarch_start();
> +#ifdef USE_SYSTEMD
> + if (!EnableHotStandby)
> + sd_notify(0, "READY=1");
> pmState = PM_RECOVERY;
> if (CheckPostmasterSignal(PMSIGNAL_BEGIN_HOT_STANDBY) &&
> > Default timeout on FC is 90 sec - it is should not to be enough for
> > large servers with large shared buffers and high checkpoint segments. It
> > should be mentioned in service file.
> Good point. I think we should set TimeoutSec=0 in the suggested service
probably no other is safe