Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 12/24/2015 04:05 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >Tomas, are you still working on that? This thread is stalling for 3 weeks. > > I haven't discovered anything interesting during the testing, so I guess the > "needs review" state is appropriate. Let's move the patch to the next > commitfest. Not sure what to do here, since this patch got no feedback at all in this CF. The right thing to do, ISTM, is to just move it again to the next CF. But it'd be really useful if someone can have it a look and verify at least whether it doesn't need a rebase (requiring a further submission) so that other people can play with it. Of course, if Horiguchi-san or anyone has more review comments, that would be even better. Tomas said he'd do more testing, but we never got a report on whether anything turned up. (At this point I'm not sure if either Kyotaro or Tomas should be considered the patch author ... maybe both?) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
