David Rowley wrote: > I'm not sure that I agree with this being set to "Needs review". The last > progress that I see made on this was me hacking at the patch to remove some > equivalence class limitations. I think the logical next step would be for > you to look at these changes and either accept or reject them. So does that > not suit "Waiting on author" better than "Needs review" ?
Tomas, I think we need you need to submit a new version of this patch, please. Closing it for now. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers