Alvaro Herrera <> writes:
> ....  Anyway I think the tests here are
> massive and the code is not; perhaps people get the mistaken impression
> that this is a huge amount of code which scares them.  Perhaps you could
> split it up in (1) code and (2) tests, which wouldn't achieve any
> technical benefit but would offer some psychological comfort to
> potential reviewers.  You know it's all psychology in these parts.

Perhaps the tests could be made less bulky.  We do not need massive
permanent regression tests for a single feature, IMO.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to