On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:54:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Understood. My point is that there is a short list of read events, and > > many DDL events. We have already hesitated to record DDL changes for > > logical replication because of the code size, maintenance overhead, and > > testing required. > > DDL is already captured using the event triggers mechanism (which is > what it was invented for in the first place). The only thing we don't > have is a hardcoded mechanism to transform it from C struct format to > SQL language.
Advertising
Right, which is I think were the maintenance/testing overhead will come from, which we are trying to avoid. Having logical replication and auditing share that burden would be a win. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
