On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:24 PM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: > On 2/1/16 5:25 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> David Steele wrote: > >>> 2) There would be two different ways to suppress client messages but I was >>> hoping to only have one. >> >> I think they are two different things actually. > > Fair enough - that was my initial reaction as well but then I thought > the other way would be better. > >> I'm closing this as returned with feedback. > > I have attached a patch that adds an ereport() macro to suppress client > output for a single report call (applies cleanly on 1d0c3b3). I'll also > move it to the next CF.
I don't see any reason not to accept this. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers