On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes, please let's use the custom language, and let's not care of not >> more than 1 level of nesting so as it is possible to represent >> pg_stat_replication in a simple way for the user. > > "not" is used twice in this sentence in a way that renders me not able > to be sure that I'm not understanding it not properly.
4 times here. Score beaten. Sorry. Perhaps I am tired... I was just wondering if it would be fine to only support configurations up to one level of nested objects, like that: 2[node1, node2, node3] node1, 2[node2, node3], node3 In short, we could restrict things so as we cannot define a group of nodes within an existing group. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers