On 2/4/16 3:37 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2016-02-03 09:28:24 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Would we still have some way of forcing the older checkpoint record to
be used if somebody wants to try to do that?
I think currently the best way to force an arbitrary checkpoint to be
used is creating a "custom" backup label. Not that nice. Not sure if we
need something nice here, I don't really see a frequent need for this.
We could add another option to pg_resetxlog alternatively :/
I guess you'd have to scan through WAL files by hand to find the next
I'm guessing that if this is happening in the field there's a decent
chance people aren't noticing it, so maybe the best thing for now is to
turn off the automatic behavior bust still have a relatively easy way to
re-enable it. In case this is more common than we think...
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: