On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Haribabu Kommi wrote: > >> Hi, Do you have any further comments on the patch that needs to be >> taken care? > > I do. I think the jsonb functions you added should be added to one of > the json .c files instead, since they seem of general applicability.
moved these functions into jsonb_util.c file. > But actually, I don't think you have ever replied to the question of why > are you using JSON in the first place; isn't a normal array suitable? It was discussed and told to use JSON for options instead of array in , because of that reason I changed. > The callback stuff is not documented in check_hba() at all. Can you > please add an explanation just above the function, so that people trying > to use it know what can the callback be used for? Also a few lines > above the callback itself would be good. Added some details in explaining the call back function. >Also, the third argument of > check_hba() is a translatable message so you should enclose it in _() so > that it is picked up for translation. The "skipped"/"matched" words > (and maybe others?) need to be marked similarly. Changed mode column (skipped/matched) and reason for mismatch details are enclosed in _() for translation. Do you find any other details needs to be enclosed? > That "Failed" in the errmsg in pg_hba_lookup() should be lowercase. corrected. > Moving to next CF. Thanks. updated patch is attached with the above corrections. This patch needs to be applied on top discard_hba_and_ident_cxt patch that is posted earlier.  - http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5547db0a.2020...@gmx.net Regards, Hari Babu Fujitsu Australia
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers