On 2016-02-12 12:37:35 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I'm not really a fan. I'd rather change existing callers to add a > > 'flags' bitmask argument. Right now there can't really be XLogInserts() > > in extension code, so that's pretty ok to change. > > Yeah, but to what benefit? You're just turning a smaller patch into a > bigger one and requiring churning a bunch of code that wouldn't > otherwise need to be touched. I think Michael has a good point.
It has the advantage of not ending up with an extra interface, that we're otherwise never going to get rid of? If not now, when would we remove it? Sure it touches a few more lines, but that's entirely trivial mechanical changes, so what? Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers