On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To be honest, my heart still balances for the Extended() interface.
>> This reduces the risk of conflicts with back-patching with 9.5.
> Andres, others, what else can I do to make this thread move on? I can
> produce any version of this patch depending on committer's
> requirements.

FWIW, I don't expect to have time to review this in the level of
detail that would make me confident to commit it any time soon.  I've
said my piece on what I think the final patch should look like, and I
hope that argument was persuasive, but I don't have anything further
to add to what I already said.  I hope some other committer has some
cycles to look at this.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to