On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:56:25PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > I agreed on ripping out the converter plugin ability of pg_upgrade. > > Remember pg_upgrade was originally written by EnterpriseDB staff, and I > > think they expected their closed-source fork of Postgres might need a > > custom page converter someday, but it never needed one, and at this > > point I think having the code in there is just making things more > > complex. I see _no_ reason for community Postgres to use a plugin > > converter because we are going to need that code for every upgrade from > > pre-9.6 to 9.6+, so why not just hard-code in the functions we need. We > > can remove it once 9.5 is end-of-life. > > > > Hm, we should rather remove the source code around PAGE_CONVERSION and > page.c at 9.6?
Yes. I can do it if you wish. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers