On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Payal Singh <pa...@omniti.com> wrote: >>>>> The feature seems to work as described, but is it necessary to enclose >>>>> multiple GUC settings in a parenthesis? This seems a deviation from the >>>>> usual syntax of altering multiple settings separated with comma. >>>> >>>> Well, note that you can say: >>>> >>>> ALTER USER bob SET search_path = a, b, c; >>>> >>>> I'm not sure how the parentheses help exactly; it seems like there is >>>> an inherit ambiguity either way. >>>> >>> >>> I thought it would be useful for user who wants to set several GUC >>> parameter for each user. Especially the case where changing logging >>> parameter for each user. >>> But it might not bring us fantastic usability. >> >> Yeah, it doesn't really seem like it's worth trying to figure out a >> syntax for this that can work. It just doesn't buy us very much vs. >> issuing one ALTER COMMAND per setting. >> > > Yeah, please mark this patch as 'rejected'. > If I can come up with another good idea, will post.
Done so. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers