On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Payal Singh <pa...@omniti.com> wrote:
> The feature seems to work as described, but is it necessary to enclose 
> multiple GUC settings in a parenthesis? This seems a deviation from the usual 
> syntax of altering multiple settings separated with comma.

Well, note that you can say:

ALTER USER bob SET search_path = a, b, c;

I'm not sure how the parentheses help exactly; it seems like there is
an inherit ambiguity either way.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to