On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Payal Singh <pa...@omniti.com> wrote: > The feature seems to work as described, but is it necessary to enclose > multiple GUC settings in a parenthesis? This seems a deviation from the usual > syntax of altering multiple settings separated with comma.
Well, note that you can say: ALTER USER bob SET search_path = a, b, c; I'm not sure how the parentheses help exactly; it seems like there is an inherit ambiguity either way. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
