On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Payal Singh <pa...@omniti.com> wrote:
> The feature seems to work as described, but is it necessary to enclose
> multiple GUC settings in a parenthesis? This seems a deviation from the usual
> syntax of altering multiple settings separated with comma.
Well, note that you can say:
ALTER USER bob SET search_path = a, b, c;
I'm not sure how the parentheses help exactly; it seems like there is
an inherit ambiguity either way.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: