On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> 
> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:

>>> I'd suggest we either name it based on the current tentative
>>> date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or
>>> something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it
>>> more clear.
>> +1 to both names suggested by Magnus.
> We do need to pick one of them :)
> Anybody else with preferences?

I would prefer to see a consistent namimg pattern (i.e., 2016-09)
and rename it if we reschedule.

Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to