On 3/1/16 3:35 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> >> wrote: >>> Magnus Hagander wrote: > >>>> I'd suggest we either name it based on the current tentative >>>> date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or >>>> something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it >>>> more clear. >>> >>> +1 to both names suggested by Magnus. >> >> We do need to pick one of them :) >> >> Anybody else with preferences? > > I would prefer to see a consistent namimg pattern (i.e., 2016-09) > and rename it if we reschedule.
I'm fine with that - it does help set expectations. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net
Description: OpenPGP digital signature