On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2003 16:27 > > To: Katie Ward > > Cc: Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System > > > > > > The only assumption I see being made here is this: > > > > "I believe that the port, as submitted, can be used as an > > industrial-strength solution." > > > > I see no evidence to support this claim. If you have this > > evidence, feel free to share it with the rest of us. > > I hammered the betas on a couple of test boxes running Windows XP and > .NET Server of various (pre)releases and found it to be rock solid, > performing comparably to my Linux based systems. The Cygwin version fell > over quite quickly under the same tests. > > I'll admit my methods were not particularly scientific, but over the > last few weeks I've had far more grief from DB2 and SQL Server than I > did from the PostgreSQL native betas.
hammering the betas is a far cry from an "industrial-strength solution". Vince. -- Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/ http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster