On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> There might be some other things we could do to provide a fast-path for
> particularly trivial cases. But on the whole I think this plot shows that
> there's no systematic problem, and indeed not really a lot of change at
What query is that lone data point that took 8ms instead of 6ms to
plan in both charts (assuming it's the same data point)?
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: