On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> There might be some other things we could do to provide a fast-path for
> particularly trivial cases.  But on the whole I think this plot shows that
> there's no systematic problem, and indeed not really a lot of change at
> all.

Amazing data.

What query is that lone data point that took 8ms instead of 6ms to
plan in both charts (assuming it's the same data point)?


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to