On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > There might be some other things we could do to provide a fast-path for > particularly trivial cases. But on the whole I think this plot shows that > there's no systematic problem, and indeed not really a lot of change at > all.
Amazing data. What query is that lone data point that took 8ms instead of 6ms to plan in both charts (assuming it's the same data point)? -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
