> Yeah.  This is a pretty self-contained problem, it just needs someone
> who's motivated to work on it.  Mostly what we need is to understand how
> we want to extend the previously-agreed-to I/O behaviors for IPv4 inet
> and cidr types into the v6 domain.  (Or should we back up and ask if the
> inet/cidr division still makes sense in the v6 world?  I hope so, but
> if not we should face up to it...)

Maybe we should create a new type 'inet6'???


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to