On 03/08/2016 02:16 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
Instead of "durable" I think that "persistent" makes more sense.


I find durable a lot more descriptive. persistent could refer to
retrying the rename or something.

Yeah, I like durable, too.

There is also precedent, DURABLE as in aciD

JD



--
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/
                        +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to