On 10 March 2016 at 00:41, Igal @ Lucee.org <i...@lucee.org> wrote:

> On 3/8/2016 5:12 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> One of the worst problems (IMO) is in the driver architecture its self.
>> It attempts to prevent blocking by guestimating the server's send buffer
>> state and its recv buffer state, trying to stop them filling and causing
>> the server to block on writes. It should just avoid blocking on its own
>> send buffer, which it can control with confidence. Or use some of Java's
>> rather good concurrency/threading features to simultaneously consume data
>> from the receive buffer and write to the send buffer when needed, like
>> pgjdbc-ng does.
> Are there good reasons to use pgjdbc over pgjdbc-ng then?
Maturity, support for older versions (-ng just punts on support for
anything except new releases) and older JDBC specs, completeness of support
for some extensions. TBH I haven't done a ton with -ng yet.

 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Reply via email to