On 4/3/2016 8:21 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:


On 9 March 2016 at 20:49, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com <mailto:cr...@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:

    On 3/8/2016 5:12 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:


        Are there good reasons to use pgjdbc over pgjdbc-ng then?


    Maturity, support for older versions (-ng just punts on support
    for anything except new releases) and older JDBC specs,
    completeness of support for some extensions. TBH I haven't done a
    ton with -ng yet.


I'd like to turn this question around. Are there good reasons to use -ng over pgjdbc ?

As to your question, you may be interested to know that pgjdbc is more performant than ng.
That's good to know, but unfortunately pgjdbc is unusable for us until
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/488 is fixed.

Also, as I mentioned in the ticket, I can't imagine RETURNING * being performant if, for example, I INSERT a large chunk of data like an image data or an uploaded file.


Igal

Reply via email to