* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > Is the plan to remove support for floating point timestamps at some
> > stage?  If so, what is that waiting on, and would it provide
> > sufficient warning if (say) 9.6 were documented as the last major
> > release to support that build option?
> 
> AFAIK there is no particular plan to do that.  It's not like leaving
> that code in place is costing us huge amounts of maintenance effort.

Agreed, and I have little doubt that it's still used in the field given
how long it was the default for some distributions.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to