* Tom Lane ([email protected]) wrote: > Thomas Munro <[email protected]> writes: > > Is the plan to remove support for floating point timestamps at some > > stage? If so, what is that waiting on, and would it provide > > sufficient warning if (say) 9.6 were documented as the last major > > release to support that build option? > > AFAIK there is no particular plan to do that. It's not like leaving > that code in place is costing us huge amounts of maintenance effort.
Agreed, and I have little doubt that it's still used in the field given how long it was the default for some distributions. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
