On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> ISTM, that there's good enough reasons to go either way; I don't see
>> what we're gaining by making these private. That just encourages
>> copy-paste coding.
> +1.  Frustrating Citus's attempt to open-source their stuff is not in
> the project's interest.

I agree.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to