On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > ISTM, that there's good enough reasons to go either way; I don't see
> > what we're gaining by making these private. That just encourages
> > copy-paste coding.
> +1. Frustrating Citus's attempt to open-source their stuff is not in
> the project's interest.
Agreed. And it's not like we're very restrictive with this in a lot of
other parts of the code. While we shouldn't go out of our way for
forks/extensions, this seems like a very reasonable tradeoff.