On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: > On 03/11/2016 08:31 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> Joe Conway wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, back to the drawing board. Thanks for the feedback. >>> >>> Closing this one as returned-with-feedback. Please do resubmit for >>> CF 2016-03. >> >> Joe, it looks like you reactivated this patch for CF 2016-03 even >> though it hasn't been updated. So, you want a review of an updated >> patch you haven't written yet? >> >> I think this should be marked Returned with Feedback and you can >> resubmit for 9.7. > > Understood. I was scrambling to get updates to a number of these prior > to the commitfest starting and could not manage to get to this one. Done.
Thanks for understanding. Rejecting patches is not much more fun that getting your patches rejected, but it's got to be done... sorry! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers