On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > In short: we've already been over this territory, at length, > and I am not excited by people trying to bikeshed it again > after the fact, especially when no new arguments are being > presented. Can we call the discussion closed, please?
Closed, at least from my side. I'm grateful to have learned at least a bit more about when it's OK to sacrifice backwards-compatibility. Sorry for spamming this thread on that topic, I'll instead wade through the archives to see what more I can learn to hopefully become less confused. Thanks. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers