On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Alexander Korotkov <
> a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>
>> I don't think we can rely on median that much if we have only 3 runs.
>> For 3 runs we can only apply Kornfeld method which claims that confidence
>> interval should be between lower and upper values.
>> Since confidence intervals for master and patched versions are
>> overlapping we can't conclude that expected TPS numbers are different.
>> Dilip, could you do more runs? 10, for example. Using such statistics we
>> would be able to conclude something.
>>
>
> Here is the reading for 10 runs....
>
>
> Median Result
> -----------------------
>
> Client       Base          Patch
> -------------------------------------------
> 1              19873        19739
> 2              38658        38276
> 4              68812        62075
>
> Full Results of 10 runs...
>
>  Base
> -------------
>  Runs  1 Client    2 Client      4 Client
> -----------------------------------------------------
>     1    19442        34866        49023
>     2    19605        35139        51695
>     3    19726        37104        53899
>     4    19835        38439        55708
>     5    19866        38638        67473
>     6    19880        38679        70152
>     7    19973        38720        70920
>     8    20048        38737        71342
>     9    20057        38815        71403
>     10  20344        41423        77953
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Patch
> -----------
> Runs  1 Client     2 Client      4 Client
> ------------------------------------------------------
>     1    18881        30161        54928
>     2    19415        32031        59741
>     3    19564        35022        61060
>     4    19627        36712        61839
>     5    19670        37659        62011
>     6    19808        38894        62139
>     7    19857        39081        62983
>     8    19910        39923        75358
>     9    20169        39937        77481
>     10  20181        40003        78462
> ------------------------------------------------------
>

I've drawn graphs for these measurements. The variation doesn't look random
here.  TPS is going higher from measurement to measurement.  I bet you did
measurements sequentially.
I think we should do more measurements until TPS stop growing and beyond to
see accumulate average statistics.  Could you please do the same tests but
50 runs.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to