On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Verite <dan...@manitou-mail.org> wrote:
>> But worse than either of  those things, there is no real
>> agreement on what the overall design of this feature
>> should be.
> The part in the design that raised concerns upthread is
> essentially how headers sorting is exposed to the user and
> implemented.
> As suggested in [1], I've made some drastic changes in the
> attached patch to take the comments (from Dean R., Tom L.)
> into account.
> [ ... lengthy explanation ... ]
> - also NULLs are no longer excluded from headers, per Peter E.
>   comment in [2].

Dean, Tom, Peter, what do you think of the new version?

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to