On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Verite <dan...@manitou-mail.org> wrote: >> But worse than either of those things, there is no real >> agreement on what the overall design of this feature >> should be. > > The part in the design that raised concerns upthread is > essentially how headers sorting is exposed to the user and > implemented. > > As suggested in [1], I've made some drastic changes in the > attached patch to take the comments (from Dean R., Tom L.) > into account. > [ ... lengthy explanation ... ] > - also NULLs are no longer excluded from headers, per Peter E. > comment in [2].
Dean, Tom, Peter, what do you think of the new version? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
