On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > There hasn't been a new version of this patch in 9 months, you're > clearly not in a hurry to produce one, and nobody else seems to feel > strongly that this is something that needs to be done at all. I think > we could just let this go and be just fine, but instead of doing that > and moving onto patches that people do feel strongly about, we're > arguing about this. Bummer.
I'm busy working on fixing an OpenSSL bug affecting all released versions right at the moment, but have a number of complex 9.6 patches to review, most of which are in need of support. I'm very busy. I said that I'd get to this patch soon. I might be kicking the can down the road a little with this patch; if so, I'm sorry. I suggest we leave it at that, until the CF is almost over or until I produce a revision. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers