On 2016-03-14 17:17:02 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There hasn't been a new version of this patch in 9 months, you're
> > clearly not in a hurry to produce one, and nobody else seems to feel
> > strongly that this is something that needs to be done at all.  I think
> > we could just let this go and be just fine, but instead of doing that
> > and moving onto patches that people do feel strongly about, we're
> > arguing about this.  Bummer.
> I'm busy working on fixing an OpenSSL bug affecting all released
> versions right at the moment, but have a number of complex 9.6 patches
> to review, most of which are in need of support. I'm very busy.

So? You're not the only one. I don't see why we shouldn't move this to
'returned with feedback' until there's a new version.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to