On 3/4/16 2:56 PM, Vitaly Burovoy wrote:

> On 3/4/16, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennik...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>> I think that you should update documentation. At least description of
>> epoch on this page:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-datetime.html
> Thank you very much for pointing where it is located (I saw only
> "to_timestamp(TEXT, TEXT)").
> I'll think how to update it.

Vitaly, have you decided how to update this yet?

>> 3. (nitpicking) I don't sure about "4STAMPS" suffix. "4" is nice
>> abbreviation, but it seems slightly confusing to me.
> It doesn't matter for me what it is called, it is short enough and
> reflects a type on which it is applied.
> What would the best name be for it?

Anastasia, any suggestions for a better name, or just leave it as is?

I'm not in favor of the "4", either.  I think I would prefer


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to