On 3/4/16 2:56 PM, Vitaly Burovoy wrote: > On 3/4/16, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennik...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > >> I think that you should update documentation. At least description of >> epoch on this page: >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-datetime.html > > Thank you very much for pointing where it is located (I saw only > "to_timestamp(TEXT, TEXT)"). > I'll think how to update it.
Vitaly, have you decided how to update this yet? >> 3. (nitpicking) I don't sure about "4STAMPS" suffix. "4" is nice >> abbreviation, but it seems slightly confusing to me. > > It doesn't matter for me what it is called, it is short enough and > reflects a type on which it is applied. > What would the best name be for it? Anastasia, any suggestions for a better name, or just leave it as is? I'm not in favor of the "4", either. I think I would prefer JULIAN_MAXYEAR_STAMP. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers