On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Given the lack of any other complaints about this, I'm okay with the
> approach as presented.  (I haven't read the patch in detail, though.)

FWIW, I am still of the opinion that the last patch sent by Peter is
in a pretty good shape.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to