On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Given the lack of any other complaints about this, I'm okay with the >> approach as presented. (I haven't read the patch in detail, though.) > > FWIW, I am still of the opinion that the last patch sent by Peter is > in a pretty good shape.
Great. I've marked this patch as "Ready for Committer" in the CommitFest application. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers