On 3/15/16 7:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
In short, I think we should reject this implementation and instead try
to implement the type operators we want in the core grammar's Typename
production, from which plpgsql will pick it up automatically.


Something else that's been discussed is allowing [] referencing to be more modular. Offhand I don't see how that would impact this new type referencing stuff, but maybe someone else sees an issue.

BTW, it might also be useful to allow {} to work as a reference method.
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to