On 3/6/16 1:17 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2016-03-05 21:49 GMT+01:00 Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com > <mailto:m...@joeconway.com>>: > > I still don't see any point in trying to pass data back from the hooks > as the extension can maintain that state just fine, although it looks > like it would be pretty trivial to do using a new void* member added to > role_auth_extra. Tom (or anyone else), any comment on that? > > see Tom's comment, I share his opinion. > > I do however find myself wishing I could pass the action down from > set_config_option() to at least the assign_role() hook, but that seems > more invasive than I'd like. > > describe this use case, please.
Joe, it looks there are some unresolved questions from Pavel and Craig on this thread and probably a new patch is required. Any idea when you can get to that? Thanks, -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
