On 03/16/2016 08:28 AM, David Steele wrote: > On 3/6/16 1:17 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> 2016-03-05 21:49 GMT+01:00 Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com >> <mailto:m...@joeconway.com>>: >> >> I still don't see any point in trying to pass data back from the hooks >> as the extension can maintain that state just fine, although it looks >> like it would be pretty trivial to do using a new void* member added to >> role_auth_extra. Tom (or anyone else), any comment on that? >> >> see Tom's comment, I share his opinion. >> >> I do however find myself wishing I could pass the action down from >> set_config_option() to at least the assign_role() hook, but that seems >> more invasive than I'd like. >> >> describe this use case, please. > > Joe, it looks there are some unresolved questions from Pavel and Craig > on this thread and probably a new patch is required. Any idea when you > can get to that?
I won't likely have time for a day or two, but will definitely get back to this worst case this coming weekend. Thanks, Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
