On March 21, 2016 5:12:38 AM GMT+01:00, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The article pointed by you justifies that the way ResetEvent is done by >patch is correct. I am not sure, but you can weigh, if there is a need >of >comment so that if we want enhance this part of code (or want to write >something similar) in future, we don't need to rediscover this fact. I've added a reference in a comment. Did you have a chance of running the patched versions on windows? I plan to push this sometime today, so I can get on to some performance patches I was planning to look into committing. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
