Hi, I am unable to revert 6150a1b0 on top of recent commit in the master branch. It seems like there has been some commit made recently that has got dependency on 6150a1b0.
With Regards, Ashutosh Sharma EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2016-03-27 02:34:32 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote: > > As mentioned in my earlier mail i was not able to apply > > *pinunpin-cas-5.patch* on commit *6150a1b0, > > That's not surprising; that's pretty old. > > > *therefore i thought of applying it on the latest commit and i was > > able to do it successfully. I have now taken the performance readings > > at latest commit i.e. *76281aa9* with and without applying > > *pinunpin-cas-5.patch* and my observations are as follows, > > > > > 1. I can still see that the current performance lags by 2-3% from the > > expected performance when *pinunpin-cas-5.patch *is applied on the commit > > > > *76281aa9.* > > 2. When *pinunpin-cas-5.patch *is ignored and performance is measured at > > commit *76281aa9 *the overall performance lags by 50-60% from the > expected > > performance. > > > > *Note:* Here, the expected performance is the performance observed before > > commit *6150a1b0 *when* ac1d794 *is reverted. > > Thanks for doing these benchmarks. What's the performance if you revert > 6150a1b0 on top of a recent master? There've been a lot of other patches > influencing performance since 6150a1b0, so minor performance differences > aren't necessarily meaningful; especially when that older version then > had other patches reverted. > > Thanks, > > Andres >