On 03/30/2016 06:01 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Thank you for polishing this.
At Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:31:19 -0500, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote in
I tried to whip this into shape, but there were a few areas I
didn't feel I had the necessary understanding to feel comfortable
taking on the committer role for it. I've cleaned it up the best I
could, fixing whitespace and typos, eliminating an unnecessary
addition of an include, improving C comments (at least to my eye),
and adding an Assert where it seemed like a good idea to me.
Especially for this one,
@@ -2697,6 +2697,7 @@ check_partial_indexes(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel)
continue; /* don't repeat work if
already proven OK */
have_partial = true;
The initialization has been moved to set_rel_size so the break
can be restored.
FWIW the break was restored in the v9 by me.
My own tests and those of others show performance improvements (up
to 10x for some tests) and no significant performance degradation,
even with attempts to create "worst case" scenarios.
The only changes to the regression tests are to change an "out"
file to eliminate re-checking the index predicate against the heap
on every matching row, which seems like a good thing.
I'm taking my name off as committer and marking it "Ready for
Committer". If someone else wants to comment on the issues where
Tom and Kyotaro-san still seem unsatisfied to the point where I
can get my head around it, I could maybe take it back on as
committer -- if anyone feels that could be a net win.
FWIW, as mentioned upthread, I added the following condition to
decline ripping index predicates from base restrictinfo without
understanding the reason to do so.
Ummmm, I'm a bit confused. Which condition?
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: